Brazilian Journal of Biological Sciences (ISSN 2358-2731)



Home Archive v. 5, no. 10 (2018) Ghazouani

 

Vol. 5, No. 10, p. 249-258 - Aug. 31, 2018

 

Life cycle analysis of raw milk production in Tunisia



Amira Ghazouani , Naceur M'hamdi , Ibrahim-El-Akram Znaidi , Cyrine Darej , Norchene Guoiaa , Maroua Hasnaoui , Rachid Bouraoui and Hajer M'hamdi

Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of dairy production. A survey was conducted in 20 dairy farms at the governorate of Sousse. The present study aimed to evaluate environmental impact of milk production at the farm regarding GHG emission and energy consumption. In the 20 dairy farms total GHG emissions resulted in a mean of 0.63 + 0.2 kg CH4/kg ECM and forage can contribute with a means 0.35 Le kg CO2eq/DM. The main reductions in GHG emissions per kg of FPCM started from 2,347 kg per cow per year and then the reduction slowed down to stabilize at around 6,127 kg FPCM per cow per year.


Keywords
Life cycle analysis; Mitigation; Carbon footprint; Milk corrected.

DOI
10.21472/bjbs.051005

Full text
PDF

References
Adler. A. A.; Doole. G. J.; Romera. A. J.; Beukes, P. C. Managing greenhouse gas emissions in two major dairy regions of New Zealand: A system-level evaluation. Agricultural Systems, v. 135, p. 1-9, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.11.007

Andrén, O.; Kätterer, T. ICBM: The introductory carbon balance model for exploration of soil carbon balances. Ecological Applications, v. 7, no. 4, p. 1226-1236, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1226:ITICBM]2.0.CO;2

Baek. C. Y.; Lee, K. M.; Park, K. H. Quantification and control of the greenhouse gas emissions from a dairy cow system. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 70, p. 50-60, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.010

Biggs, E. M.; Bruce, E.; Boruff, B.; Duncan, J. M. A.; Horsley, J.; Pauli, N.; McNeill, K.; Neef, A.; Van Ogtrop, F. V.; Curnow, J.; Haworth, B.; Duce, S.; Imanari, Y. Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 54, p. 389-397, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002

Capper, J. L.; Cady, R. A.; Bauman, D. E. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science, v. 87, no. 6, p. 2160-2167, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1781

Dong, Y.; Xia, B.; Chen, W. Carbon footprint of urban areas: an analysis based on emission sources account model. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 44, p. 181-189, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.07.013

Gerber, P. J.; Steinfeld, H.; Henderson, B.; Mottet, A.; Opio, C.; Dijkman, J.; Falcucci, A.; Tempio, G. Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: FAO, 2013.

Hawkins, J.; Weersink, A.; Wagner-Riddle, C.; Fox, G. Optimizing ration formulation as a strategy for greenhouse gas mitigation in intensive dairy production systems. Agricultural Systems, v. 137, p. 1-11, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.03.007

Kröbel, R.; Bolinder, M. A.; Janzen, H. H.; Little, S. M.; Vandenbygaart, A. J.; Kätterer, T. Canadian farm-level soil carbon change assessment by merging the greenhouse gas model Holos with the Introductory Carbon Balance Model (ICBM). Agricultural Systems, v. 143, p. 76-85, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.010

Laratte, B.; Guillaume, B.; Kim, J.; Birregah, B. Modeling cumulative effects in life cycle assessment: The case of fertilizer in wheat production contributing to the global warming potential. The Science of the Total Environment, v. 481, p. 588-595, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.020

Little, S. M.; Lindeman, J.; Maclean, K.; Janzen, H. H. Holos: A Tool to Estimate and Reduce GHGs from Farms; Methodology and Algorithms for Version 2.0. Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2013.

Mantyka-Pringle, C. S.; Visconti, P. ; Di Marco, M.; Martin, T. G.; Rondinini, C.; Rhodes, J. R. Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change. Biological Conservation, v. 187, p. 103-111, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016

NRC - Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Research Council Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition. 7. ed. rev. Washington. D. C., USA: Committee on animal Nutrition. National Academy Press, 2001.

Orphant, S. T. C. Life cycle assessment of the production of raw milk. Queensland: The University of Southern, Queensland Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, 2004. (Dissertation).

Tieri, M. P. ; Faverin, C. ; Charlón, V.; Comerón, E. A.; Gonda, H. L. Analysis of different productive strategies on greenhouse gases emissions in Argentinian dairy production systems. Anais da 54a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, Foz do Iguaçu, 2017.

Upton, J. J.; Humphreys, P. W. G.; Groot Koerkamp, P.; French, P.; Dillonvand, I.; De Boer, J. M. Life cycle assessment of energy use on Irish dairy farms. INTERREG - IVB North-West Europe, the 'Dairyman' Project, 2011.

Vergé, X. P. C.; Maxime, D.; Dyer, J. A.; Desjardins, R. L.; Arcand, Y.; Vanderzaag, A. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues. Journal of Dairy Science, v. 96, n. 9, p. 6091-6104, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6563

Wang, X.; Kristensen, T.; Mogensen, L.; Knudsen, M. T.; Wang, X. Greenhouse gas emissions and land use from confinement dairy farms in the Guanzhong plain of China-using a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 113, p. 577-586, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.099

Weidema, B.; Wesnæs, M.; Hermansen, J.; Kristensen, T.; Halberg, N.; Eder, P.; Delgado, L. (Eds.). Environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products. Seville: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2791/38863

Zhao, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Huang, T. An optimization model for green supply chain management by using a big data analytic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 1085-1097, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.006